User talk:Jereriviel

File:Chua at the Motor Show 2015.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chua at the Motor Show 2015.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. EricEnfermero (Talk) 10:06, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Paige Chua. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Begoon 02:55, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable source

It’s not unsourced. I’m her personal assistant. Someone was writing wrong sources all the time Jereriviel (talk) 01:10, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you are, indeed, "her personal assistant", then you need to read the information I'm about to post below, and ensure that you comply with all parts of it, particularly the declarations required by WP:PAID. -- Begoon 01:35, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, yes, your edits were indeed unsourced - [1], [2]. You provided no source(s) whatsoever. Wikipedia doesn't care what you personally "know" - all content needs to be supported by a reliable, third-party source. Please read WP:Verifiability, WP:RS, WP:REFB. -- Begoon 01:52, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Jereriviel. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Paige Chua, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

• In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

• Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. -- Begoon 01:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ridiculous

This is ridiculous. I don’t get how come some other users can just amend the wiki page without any proper sourcing in addition that the information is wrong. I’m just trying to correct the filmography. Being neutral about it and not posting any bias views. Jereriviel (talk) 15:13, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I took considerable care to answer all those questions above. Did you read all the linked material? You need to pay particular attention to WP:RS and WP:REFB. What's "ridiculous" is your insistence on repeatedly spamming the same piece of content without correct sourcing - despite the number of times this has been explained to you. References need to directly support content, and are not just "any old links to any external material" unrelated to content.
Also, please be aware that it is not permitted to edit the same article(s) logged in and logged out in order to avoid scrutiny of your edits. If you have been editing the article as an IP editor as well as with this account you should declare the connection. It seems fairly clear that 58.182.230.45 is you so you need to be aware that blocks apply to a person, not just an account or ip number.
Additionally, you said "I’m her personal assistant." If indeed you are, what have you done to follow up the requirements I linked for you above about disclosures per WP:PAID and WP:COI? -- Begoon 00:26, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]